One of the most controversial ethical arguments today is whether the United States of America’s government should be allowed to remove information from the internet if it could be used by terrorists. This is known as a form of internet censorship and could be deemed unconstitutional or vital to national security depending on the viewpoint. Both the preservation of information and the safety of American citizens is important, but should the knowledge be sacrificed to ensure American lives. Or should this information be red flagged but still made available. Is this a violation of personnel freedom, should all types of information be accessible to anyone? The first viewpoint is that in order to save innocent lives, every possible measure should be taken even if it means the exclusion of certain types of information. Not all information is necessary for all citizens to live their lives. Especially knowledge that could be used for dangerous purpose...